PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF LOCOREGIONAL FAILURE IN LIMITED SCLC

Acta Oncol. 2015 Jul 23:1-8. [Epub ahead of print]

Evaluation of factors associated with loco-regional failure and survival in limited disease small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Winther-Larsen A1, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, Khalil AA, Knap MM.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 

Loco-regional failure (LRF) remains a significant problem in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dose-escalation may be a way forward to reduce the failure rate. However, the risk of toxicity rises with increasing doses. Knowledge on factors associated with LRF could aid the selection of patients for more aggressive treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate factors correlated with LRF in a cohort of LD-SCLC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, factors associated with improved survival were investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: 

We included 147 consecutive LD-SCLC patients treated from 2007 to 2013. Radiotherapy was delivered as either 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily or 46-50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions once daily. Chemotherapy was etoposide combined with either carboplatin or cisplatin given mainly concomitantly with radiotherapy. Pattern of first failure and survival were evaluated retrospectively. Cumulative LRF (CLRF) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of covariates on LRF and OS was evaluated by using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS: 

With a median follow-up time of 42.2 months, 37 patients experienced LRF as first failure. Isolated LRF was seen in 16 patients, but no isolated regional failure was seen. The CLRF rate was 22% at 1-year and 43% at 3-years. N3-stage was an independent prognostic factor correlated with LRF development (p = 0.043). Median OS was 24.1 months (95% CI 19-29 months) and a three-year survival of 34%. Prognostic factors associated with improved OS were staging including a positron emission tomography (PET) scan (p = 0.004) and receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION: 

N3-stage was an independent prognostic factor for LRF. Receiving a pretreatment PET scan and receiving PCI were prognostic factors for improved OS. Reduction in LRF may be achieved with dose-escalation in patients with N3-stage. This can be evaluated in prospective dose-escalation trials.