Παρασκευή 28 Φεβρουαρίου 2014

INFUSION PUMPS MALFUNCTIONS

 2014 Feb 18. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.74. [Epub ahead of print]

Epidemiology and natural history of central venous access device use and infusion pump function in the NO16966 trial.



Abstract

Background:Central venous access devices in fluoropyrimidine therapy are associated with complications; however, reliable data are lacking regarding their natural history, associated complications and infusion pump performance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods:We assessed device placement, use during treatment, associated clinical outcomes and infusion pump perfomance in the NO16966 trial.Results:Device replacement was more common with FOLFOX-4 (5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+oxaliplatin) than XELOX (capecitabine+oxaliplatin) (14.1% vs 5.1%). Baseline device-associated events and post-baseline removal-/placement-related events occurred more frequently with FOLFOX-4 than XELOX (11.5% vs 2.4% and 8.5% vs 2.1%). Pump malfunctions, primarily infusion accelerations in 16% of patients, occurred within 1.6-4.3% of cycles. Fluoropyrimidine-associated grade 3/4 toxicity was increased in FOLFOX-4-treated patients experiencing a malfunction compared with those who did not (97 out of 155 vs 452 out of 825 patients), predominantly with increased grade 3/4 neutropenia (53.5% vs 39.8%). Febrile neutropenia rates were comparable between patient cohorts±malfunction. Efficacy outcomes were similar in patient cohorts±malfunction.Conclusions:Central venous access device removal or replacement was common and more frequent in patients receiving FOLFOX-4. Pump malfunctions were also common and were associated with increased rates of grade 3/4 haematological adverse events. Oral fluoropyrimidine-based regimens may be preferable to infusional 5-FU based on these findings.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 18 February 2014; doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.74 www.bjcancer.com.

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια: