ASN 2008: Stents Provide No Benefit in Renal Artery Revascularization
November 14, 2008 (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) — New data reveal that using stents to open up kidney arteries, a procedure commonly used to treat patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease, provides no benefit. This is the conclusion of the Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL) trial, which was presented here at Renal Week 2008, the American Society of Nephrology Annual Meeting, by Keith Wheatley, professor of medical statistics and codirector, University of Birmingham (UK) Clinical Trials Unit.
From 2000 to 2007, Dr. Wheatley and his colleagues, including lead nephrologist Phil Kalra, MD, and lead interventional radiologist Professor Jon Moss, studied 806 patients with atherosclerotic disease. Patients were randomized to revascularization with medical therapy or medical therapy alone. Study end points were renal function (serum creatine level), blood pressure, major renal and vascular events, and mortality.
Outcomes were measured at 5 years using repeated measures analysis for continuous data, and survival analysis for time-to-event data with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. Baseline values (means) were age, 71 years; serum creatine, 179 µmol/L; glomerular fraction rate, 40 mL/minute; blood pressure, 150/76 mm Hg; percent receiving stenosis, 76%; and men, 63%.
Study data revealed no difference between the revascularization and medical-treatment only groups for renal events (46 vs 47; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 - 1.48; P = .90); cardiovascular events (95 vs 107; HR, .90; 95% CI, 0.66 - 1.15, P = .30); or mortality (79 vs 81; HR, .92; 95% CI, 0.68 - 1.26; P = .60). The overall mortality rate during the study was 43%.
"In the group of patients with incidental renal artery stenosis, our findings are that there is no benefit whatsoever of renal revascularization over purely medical treatment. These are the groups of patients for whom one discovers incidental renal disease," Dr. Kalra told Medscape Nephrology.
"Also, in patients with advanced CKD [chronic kidney disease] with renal artery stenosis, or with severe hypertension, there is no benefit found either in renal or blood pressure levels as a result of revascularization, so there is no point in subjecting patients to a procedure that has definite dangers," continued Dr. Kalra, who is affiliated with the department of renal medicine, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
"Our study showed no apparent benefit for revascularization to any subgroups," Professor Wheatley told Medscape Nephrology. "Such 'negative' trials are, nevertheless, very useful and enable treatments that do not work, and which may have risks associated with them, to be eliminated from practice."
"We haven't answered the whole question here," Dr. Kalra continued. "There might be subgroups that might benefit from revascularization ... We anticipate further subgroup evaluation, several post hoc analyses to look at other issues, such as severity of disease and mortality within subgroups."
"This is a disease that is important, and is increasing in frequency as best as we can tell, and we don't have a lot of data about whether the use of stents for renal artery stenosis is better or doesn't do anything for these patients," Stuart Linas, MD, told Medscape Nephrology. "As such, this is really the first big study published in this area, and is very important in that regard.
"After saying that, I have a couple of concerns that we can't quite make the kinds of generalized conclusions that the authors make, that maybe we shouldn't be performing these stenting procedures. ... I don't agree that the ASTRAL study is really going to answer that question," said Dr. Linas, who is a professor of medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver Health Medical Center.
"The study authors are very proud of the fact that the study entry criteria were pretty broad-based," Dr. Linas continued. "I'm not sure yet, from what I've seen, that these populations are well-matched with regard to underlying cardiovascular disease, underlying chronic kidney disease, and things like that."
"The second thing that concerns me is that I don't know what the extent of renal artery stenosis is in all these patients. The authors don't define it as well as I would like them to, with regard to whether they know if these are clinically significant renal artery lesions. By that I mean, is it something that is really a tight stenosis, that might lead to one outcome; or is it not such a tight stenosis. I wish they had better defined that issue before doing the study, because it is possible [that] they were stenting people that didn't need to be stented in the first place."
"The last comment that I would make, which I think is important, is that they standardized as 'stent' or 'no stent,' and stated that everybody got 'treated medically.' I don't know what that means — were the patients in those groups treated to the same level of blood-pressure control, because we know that that will affect both the CV [cardiovascular] outcomes and the kidney outcomes; were they all on ACEs [angiotensin-converting enzymes] or ARBs [angiotensin receptor blockers], or was there a difference between the groups; was their statin and other cholesterol management the same; were they all on angiotensin receptor blockers, or were some on and some not?"
"The bottom line is that this is an important topic, and the researchers deserve a lot of credit," Dr. Linas continued. "But there are a lot of things about this study that make me worry that it is not as generalizable as they would have you believe."
"There is a study under way called the CORAL study (Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Artery Lesions), funded by the NIH [National Institutes of Health]," he continued. "This study perhaps better defines population groups and degree of stenosis, and addresses the concerns I have. That's the one I think will be more helpful to answer some of these questions."
The ASTRAL study received no commercial funding. Dr. Wheatley, Dr. Kalra, and Dr. Linas reported no relevant financial relationships.