Παρασκευή 19 Ιουνίου 2009

FIRST LINE GEFITINIB THERAPY

First-Line Gefitinib for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Without Indication for Chemotherapy

Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Usui K, et al; North East Japan Gefitinib Study Group
J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1394-1400. Epub 2009 Feb 17

Summary

Japanese investigators who have been examining the optimal role of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted a small phase 2 study of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC with poor performance status (PS) and known EGFR mutations. Thirty patients who were considered inappropriate candidates for cytotoxic chemotherapy due to a poor PS -- 22 of whom had PS 3-4 -- were treated with 250 mg/day single-agent gefitinib. The objective response rate was 66%, with a disease control rate of 90%. Further, 79% of patients were reported to have experienced an improvement in their PS. The 1-year survival rate was 63%, with a median overall survival of 17.8 months (range, 12-26 months). There were no reported treatment-associated fatalities.

Viewpoint

This most provocative report suggests that it is reasonable to consider first-line treatment solely with a known inhibitor of EGFR in carefully selected patients with NSCLC and documented EGFR mutations.

Use of the relatively less-toxic targeted therapeutic approach would seem to be a highly rational strategy in this clinical setting. It is important for other investigative groups with similar patient populations to report their experiences in this setting and to confirm (or refute) the impressive observations in this report.

The investigators defined a patient population of which the alternative strategy of employing standard cytotoxic chemotherapy was believed to be inappropriate. Their results provide strong support for future studies that directly compare in a randomized trial single-agent anti-EGFR therapy with standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and a documented EGFR mutation who would potentially be candidates to receive cytotoxic drugs. Such an approach will be important to document the relative efficacy vs toxicity of these 2 strategies in this difficult clinical setting.

AN INTERESTING REGIMEN FOR THYMOMA

Related Articles, Links

Refractory recurrent thymoma successfully treated with long-acting somatostatin analogue and prednisolone.

Ito J, Sekiya M, Miura K, Yoshimi K, Suzuki T, Seyama K, Izumi H, Uekusa T, Takahashi K.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo.

The patient was 54-year-old woman diagnosed as recurrent invasive thymoma (type B3; WHO classification). Although partial response was obtained by systemic chemotherapy (PAC: cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), the tumor started to become enlarged after cessation of chemotherapy. Combined treatment of octreotide and prednisolone was administrated because various chemotherapies, including PAC, were not effective. After seven months, the tumor size was markedly decreased. The combination of octreotide and prednisolone should be considered as one of the choices of treatment in patients with recurrent thymoma.

EVEROLIMUS FOR LYMPHOMA

June 16, 2009 (Berlin, Germany) — Everolimus has shown single-agent activity in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease in a proof-of-concept phase 2 trial. The results show that the drug's novel mechanism of action — the inhibition of mTOR kinase — is clinically relevant in these diseases, and further research along these lines might eventually lead to a new class of agents for a broad range of lymphomas, say researchers.

The results, reported here at the 14th Congress of the European Hematology Association, have already prompted the manufacturer, Novartis, to initiate a phase 3 trial in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Everolimus was recently launched as Afinitor for use in kidney cancer in the United States, and is awaiting approval for this indication in Europe. The drug is also being investigated in a number of other cancers, including breast, gastric, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sound Rationale for This Mode of Action

"There was sound rationale to test the mTOR inhibitors in lymphoma," said principal investigator Thomas Witzig, MD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. He explained to Medscape Oncology that mTOR kinase is a key regulator of the PI3K signal transduction pathway, which is important to the growth and survival of cancer cells. It is also involved in Akt activation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and in cyclin D translation in mantle cell lymphoma.

The trial was conducted in 145 patients with relapsed lymphoma. They include 77 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 41 with indolent lymphoma, 8 with T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 17 with Hodgkin's disease.

Patients received oral everolimus 10 mg daily and were evaluated monthly. They could remain on the drug until their disease progressed or until they developed toxicity.

The overall response rate was 33%, although the responses varied by disease subgroup. The best responses (53%) were seen in patients with Hodgkin's disease, Dr. Witzig noted.

"We were pleased to see responses in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed lymphoma," he explained. In such a patient population "anything over 20% is considered of interest and worthy of further study," he said. The 33% seen in the trial is "a modest response rate and in line with other new agents, such as bortezemib," he added.

"The side effects were tolerable. Patients were able to stay on the drug for an extended period of time — some as long as nearly 3 years," he said.

"Although we are encouraged by the modest single-agent response to everolimus, we are not satisfied with 33%," Dr. Witzig added. His team has recently completed a phase 1 study that combined everolimus with another signal transduction inhibitor, sorafenib, which has a different mechanism of action.

The team hopes to achieve even higher responses by blocking 2 different pathways. "I am certain there will be other studies and combinations in the future," Dr. Witzig said, adding: "I believe that this will offer patients a new class of drugs for a broad range of lymphomas."

Phase 3 Study Already Begun

The phase 2 study was initiated by Mayo Clinic investigators, but Novartis supplied the drug and provided "a modest amount of money to support data collection, etc," Dr. Witzig told Medscape Oncology.

The results have prompted Novartis to initiate a larger, worldwide phase 3 study. This will be conducted in poor-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who have achieved a complete remission with the combination of first-line rituximab and chemotherapy. About 50% of such patients relapse, but there is no approved therapy for this group; this represents an unmet medical need, the company noted in a press release. The trial will evaluate the potential of everolimus to extend disease-free survival in these patients.

Dr. Witzig reports having been on advisory boards for Novartis, but was uncompensated (honoraria went to the Mayo Clinic).

14th Congress of the European Hematology Association: Abstract 1081. Presented June 8, 2009.

EMEA APPROVALS

Everolimus approved by EMEA for the second line treatment of advanced RCC after progression despite treatment with VEGF-targeted therapy

08.06.09
Category: Scientific News

Extended indication for pemetrexed to include monotherapy maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC in patients whose disease has not progressed immediately following platinum-based chemotherapy


At the May, 2009 the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted positive opinions, recommending the granting of a marketing authorisation, for the following medicines:

Everolimus for the second line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in patients whose disease has progressed despite treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy.

Everolimus displays anti-neoplastic activity by inhibiting the mTOR protein kinase pathway, thus inhibiting cell growth, proliferation and survival. This pathway is also involved in angiogenesis, also decreased by everolimus treatment which inhibits the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Everolimus treatment achieves the prolongation of progression free survival by about 3 months. Patients may experience stomatitis/mucositis, infections, cytopenias, rash and similar events, metabolic, renal, pulmonary or hepatic events, bleeding and thromboembolic events as the most common side effects. It is advised that treatment be made by a physician with experience in anticancer therapies.

The CHMP reviewed the quality, safety and efficacy data and determined a favorable benefit to risk balance exists, therefore granting the marketing authorization. The review finished 206 days after inception on 23 July 2008.

Plerixafor is intended for use in patients whose cells mobilize poorly, for example, patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Plerixafor is to be administered in a 20 mg/ml solution together with granculocyte –colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to achieve greater hematopoietic stem cell mobility into the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation.

The benefit of this therapy is an increase in the number of patients who reach the target number of cell mobilization as compared to treatment with G-CSF alone.

Common side effects include diarrhea, nausea and injection site redness or irritation. Administration of plerixafor is to be carried out by a physician with experience in oncology and/or hematology in an appropriate onco-hematology center with monitoring capabilities.

The review time was 207 days. This agent achieved orphan medicinal product status on 20 October 2004.

The Committee gave positive opinions for applications for the extension of indication, adding a new treatment option, for the following medicines:

Pemetrexed to include monotherapy maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in patients whose disease has not progressed immediately following platinum-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed is already authorised in this indication as monotherapy for second-line treatment after prior chemotherapy, and as first line treatment in combination with cisplatin. It is also authorised as combination therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy naive patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

VISTONURIDINE-AN ANTIDOTE FOR 5-FU OVERDOSAGE

June 17, 2009 (Orlando, Florida) — There is now an antidote for clinicians to use in the event of an overdose of the commonly used chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), according to a poster presentation here at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 45th Annual Meeting.

Use of the antidote, an investigational agent known as vistonuridine (Wellstat Therapeutics), resulted in recovery from 5-FU overdose in all 17 patients in a small study.

Notably, 14 of the 17 patients had severe enough overdoses that the expected outcome was death, said lead author, Reid von Borstel, PhD, vice president of discovery research at Wellstat Therapeutics in Gaithersburg, Maryland, which discovered and developed vistonuridine.

It is difficult to study chemotherapy overdosage because it a sensitive area of medicine, said Patrick L. McDonnell, PharmD, who was not involved with the study but was approached by Medscape Oncology for comment.

"Most overdose is due to medication error and iatrogenic — caused by the caregiver," said Dr. McDonnell, who is associate professor of clinical pharmacy at Temple University School of Pharmacy in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He did not attend the ASCO meeting.

"Staff generally do not want to discuss overdose publicly because we all try to 'do no harm'," he added, saying that such discussion is nonetheless essential to learn from mistakes.

Despite the tendency to keep the details of chemotherapy overdose in private clinic files, Dr. von Borstel and colleagues found 11 cases of 5-FU overdose in the medical literature; standard supportive care was provided in each case.

The 11 cases provided a comparator to the 17 cases in which vistonuridine was successfully used. In all 11 cases in the literature, the expected outcome was death because of the severity of the overdose. In all 11 cases, death resulted despite supportive care.

"The severity of 5-FU toxicity is a function of both absolute dose and infusion rate of a given dose. A doubling of either the dose or the infusion rate . . . is likely to be fatal, according to the published cases available for analysis," Dr. von Borstel explained to Medscape Oncology.

For each case in the study, Wellstat was contacted by physicians who had patients with 5-FU overdoses. The company obtained emergency-use investigational new-drug waivers from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and immediately flew or couriered vistonuridine to the clinics.

Vistonuridine received orphan drug designation for the treatment of 5-FU overdose on May 1 from the FDA and on May 15 from the European Medicines Agency. Wellstat will continue its discussions with these agencies regarding marketing approval, said Dr. von Borstel.

Overdose Can Happen Anywhere

In the United States, about 275,000 patients a year receive 5-FU and, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an estimated 3% experience a serious toxic reaction and more than 1300 patients die annually, write Dr. von Borstel and his Wellstat colleagues in their poster.

"I was surprised by the NIH data on overdose and death with 5-FU," said Dr. McDonnell.

Nevertheless, he suggested that overdosage can happen even in the best-run oncology clinics.

"Overdose can happen anywhere but is more likely among new staff or those in training. Busyness and distractions are also contributing factors. However, knowledge deficit about how to administer a chemotherapy is one of the most common factors," said Dr. McDonnell.

Dr. McDonnell provided an example of knowledge deficit. "In certain regimens for 5-FU, the drug is given as a continuous IV for 4 to 5 days. Staff — especially inexperienced staff — may misconstrue the total dose as the daily dose and thus give an overdose," he explained, saying that lack of knowledge due to inexperience is key.

"This is one of the best examples of medication error — when total cycle dose is given as a daily dose," he emphasized, saying it was also one of the most dangerous.

In the vistonuridine study, most of the overdoses were due to infusion-pump errors, said Dr. von Borstel.

"Infusion-pump errors can include both human error and equipment problems, and the boundary is not always distinct. Administration of 5-FU excess in our experience has often involved pump misprogramming, resulting in administration of an intended dose at a higher-than-intended rate, such as infusion over 4 hours instead of 4 days," he said, echoing Dr. McDonnell.

Designed to Overcome Delivery Problem

Vistonuridine is specific for 5-FU and for prodrugs that are converted to 5-FU after oral administration, such as capecitabine (Xeloda) and tefafure uracil (Uftoral), said Dr. von Borstel.

"Uridine, a naturally occurring nucleoside, was known as the specific pharmacological antidote for 5-FU, but uridine itself is not adequately absorbed when given orally," he noted.

Vistonuridine was designed to overcome the uridine delivery problem; it is efficiently absorbed from the intestine into the bloodstream and rapidly converted to uridine, he explained.

Vistonuridine is the first antidote for 5-FU overdose, noted Dr. von Borstel. However, antidotes exist for a few other chemotherapy overdoses, such as leucovorin (folinic acid) for methotrexate overdose, he said.

Recognizing Overdose

5-FU toxicity takes several days to become established, so a patient may not notice anything unusual at the time of the overdose, explained Dr. von Borstel.

"Some [gastrointestinal] symptoms may appear within about 4 days. Severe toxicities may be evident in about a week, and include declines in white blood cells and, much more noticeable to patients, damage to the intestinal lining, resulting in mucositis or stomatitis, nausea, and diarrhea," he said.

Patients often receive multiple courses of 5-FU and other chemotherapy agents during treatment, so if an overdose occurs in someone who has undergone previous treatments, the toxicity of an overdose may be more severe or more rapidly apparent than in someone who has received less or no previous chemotherapy, he further explained.

A NOVEL ACTION OF LAPATINIB

New insight into lapatinib

15.06.09
Category: Scientific News

The increase of HER2 dimer formation that results from inhibition of ubiquitination by laptinib actually allows greater trastuzumab-mediated cytolysis and this synergism should be further explored in clinical trials


Women with breast cancers that overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) experience more malignant disease and a poorer prognosis; HER-2 overexpression is found in a large proportion (25–30%) of human breast tumors. Lapatinib, an inhibitor of HER2 tyrosine kinase, has shown clinical benefit in these cancers, as has trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of HER2. The exact mechanism for trastuzumab activity remains but hypotheses include down regulation of the receptor, cell cycle arrest, angiogenesis inhibition and the induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.


Although some HER-2 positive tumors benefit from treatment with either agent, many remain resistant to lapatinib and trastuzumab when administered alone, leading researchers to explore their dual administration. A recent phase III trial demonstrated improved clinical outcome in patients when lapatinib and trastuzumab are administered together over lapatinib alone.


In the May, 2009 issue of Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology Aujla comments an article published by Scaltriti et al. in the Oncogene on attempt to elucidate the mechanisms of action and explain how these two agents may work together to achieve a stronger effect. They found that lapatinib treatment increased HER2 levels at the cell surface and that it had a higher affinity, even higher than ATP, for HER2 monomers than for EGFR monomers, which resulted in higher stability of HER2 dimers. Next, they investigated the degree of receptor ubiquitination and found that cells treated with lapatinib, either alone or with trastuzumab, had barely discernable levels of ubiquinated receptor. The turnover rate of HER2 in cells treated with either agent alone or in combination was determined in time-course experiments. In lapatinib treated cells, either singly or in conjunction with trastuzumab, HER2 was stable at high levels for up to 48 hours, compared with controls. Trastuzumab treated cells showed an increase in HER2 ubiquitination, subsequent degradation, and turnover.


In parallel experiments in BT474 xenograft mice, both lapatinib and trastuzumab caused tumor regression; mice treated with both agents achieved complete tumor regression within 10 days of treatment. Upon tumor analysis, HER2 expression was increased in animals treated with lapatinib alone but decreased with trastuzumab treatment. HER2 induction by lapatinib was associated with heightened trastuzumab-dependent cell cytotoxicity, thus providing a possible mechanism for the benefit seen in HER2 positive tumors treated with both agents.


The increase of HER2 dimer formation that results from inhibition of ubiquitination by laptinib actually allows greater trastuzumab-mediated cytolysis and this synergism should be further explored in clinical trials.

Τετάρτη 17 Ιουνίου 2009

BEVACIZUMAB IN BREAST CANCER

June 15, 2009 (Orlando, Florida) — A large trial, the third in a row, has confirmed the benefits of using bevacizumab (Avastin) with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Results from the RIBBON-1 study show a significant improvement in progression-free survival, similar to that seen in the previous 2 trials, even though each trial added bevacizumab to a different chemotherapy regimen.

"There is a modest but consistent effect of bevacizumab on progression-free survival, no matter which chemotherapy is used," said Clifford Hudis, MD, chief of the Breast Cancer Medical Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, "However, there is consistently no effect on overall survival."

Dr. Hudis was discussing the trial during a Highlights of the Day session here at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 45th Annual Meeting. The trial was formally presented at the meeting, although top-line results had been released by the company in a November 2008 press release.

The RIBBON-1 trial is important to Genentech, the manufacturer of bevacizumab, because the company plans to submit the data to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), along with data from the second study (the AVADO trial), to convert the drug's accelerated approval into full approval.

Accelerated Approval for Breast Cancer

The FDA granted accelerated approval for bevacizumab use in metastatic breast cancer in February 2008 on the basis of 1 study (the E2100 trial); at that time the company agreed to submit further data when they became available.

That decision to grant accelerated approval was considered to be controversial because it was based on an improvement in progression-free survival and not overall survival. The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee was almost split in its opinion, eventually voting 5 to 4 in favor of recommending approval.

However, breast cancer experts welcomed the approval, saying that progression-free survival was a reasonable end point, as reported at the time by Medscape Oncology.

The E2100 trial used bevacizumab in addition to weekly paclitaxel; the results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2007;357:2666-2676). E2100 found that, in the 722 patients studied, bevacizumab added to paclitaxel nearly doubled median progression-free survival (to 11.3 months from 5.8 months with paclitaxel alone).

"This was a practice-changing trial," reported Dr. Hudis, "and most of us who use bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer do so on the basis of this study."

The second study was the AVADO trial, which was presented at last year's ASCO annual meeting, and reported in detail at the time by Medscape Oncology. AVADO, in which bevacizumab was added to docetaxel, also showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival, although it was of a smaller magnitude than was seen in the E2100 trial.

The addition of bevacizumab to docetaxel improved the median progression-free survival to 8.7 to 8.8 months (depending on dose), compared with 8 months with docetaxel alone.

Now the RIBBON-1 trial, conducted in 1237 patients, has shown that bevacizumab significantly improves progression-free survival when added to various chemotherapy regimens. These patients, with HER2-negative disease, were divided into 2 randomized cohorts. One cohort was treated with capecitabine (Xelox) and the other was treated with a taxane or an anthracycline; each cohort then received either bevacizumab or placebo.

The increase in progression-free survival was statistically significant for both cohorts, reported lead investigator Nicholas Robert, MD, from Fairfax Northern Virginia Hematology Oncology. In the capecitabine group, progression-free survival increased from 6.2 months to 9.8 months with the addition of bevacizumab; in the taxane/anthracycline group, it increased from 8.3 months to 10.7 months. (These data come from an assessment done by an independent review committee.)

No Effect on Overall Survival

However, Dr. Robert noted that there was no significant difference in overall survival, which was a secondary end point. In the capecitabine group, median overall survival was 21.2 months vs 29 months with bevacizumab, and in the taxane/anthracycline group, median overall survival was 23.8 vs 25.2 months with bevacizumab.

When asked by physicians in the audience about this lack of effect on overall survival and the fact that this is the third trial not to find an effect, Dr. Robert explained that "overall survival as an end point is a challenge." To have overall survival as the primary end point would require much larger numbers of patients, he said. Also, there was a confounding factor in the second-line therapy that was given to patients when they progressed, he said. Sixty percent of patients receiving placebo and 50% of those receiving bevacizumab were given chemotherapy with bevacizumab on progression of their disease.

The data from this postprogression phase have not yet been reported, but "I think they are unlikely to yield any meaningful or useful information," noted Kathy Miller, MD, associate professor at Indiana University in Indianapolis, in her discussion of this study. She agreed, however, that the use of subsequent therapy in these patients "obscures the benefit of the first-line therapy." She also agreed that each individual trial was underpowered for overall survival, but suggested that now that all 3 have been completed, it would be useful to conduct a meta-analysis.

However, it might be that there is no effect on overall survival, Dr. Miller said. It might be that tumors that become resistant to bevacizumab represent more aggressive disease, or it might be that there is a rapid regrowth of vasculature after stopping bevacizumab.

Nonetheless, there are now 3 trials showing an improvement in progression-free survival, and they confirm that bevacizumab is an important component of initial chemotherapy for metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer, Dr. Miller concluded.

In the future, it will be interesting to see how this approach fits alongside anti-HER2 therapies and alongside endocrine therapy for HER2-positive disease, she commented, noting that trials exploring these questions are currently underway.

The RIBBON-1 and AVADO trials were funded by Genentech. The E21000 trial was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute and Genentech. Dr. Hudis reports receiving consultancy fees from Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Infinity, and Johnson & Johnson; honoraria from Roche and Sanofi-Aventis; and research funding from Kosan Biosciences. Dr. Robert and coauthors report receiving consultancy fees, honoraria, and research funding from Genentech, and some coauthors are company employees. Dr. Miller reports receiving consultancy fees and honoraria from Genentech, and was the principal investigator of the E2100 study.

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 45th Annual Meeting: Abstract 1005. Presented June 1, 2009.

UNBELIEVABLE

Related Articles, Links
Click here to read
The impact of zoledronic acid therapy in survival of lung cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Zarogoulidis K, Boutsikou E, Zarogoulidis P, Eleftheriadou E, Kontakiotis T, Lithoxopoulou H, Tzanakakis G, Kanakis I, Karamanos NK.

Lung Tumor Research Section, Pulmonary Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 'G. Papanikolaou' Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Bone metastases occur in 20-40% of patients with lung cancer. Recent studies demonstrate a direct antiproliferative effect of 3rd generation bisphosphonates (BPs) on lung tumors, which may influence the survival. Therefore, we examined the clinical impact of zoledronic acid (ZOL; Zometa(R)), a 3rd generation BP, with a focus on the survival, time to progression and pain effect in lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Lung cancer patients (n = 144, Stage IV) with evidence of metastasis bone scan were included. Eighty-seven of 144 experienced bone pain and received ZOL, 4 mg i.v. every 21 days (Group A), whereas the other 57 patients received no ZOL (Group B). All patients were treated with a combination chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 6. It was found that Group A had a statistically significant longer survival (p <> 0.05). Urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) levels decreased in patients with NTx

GLITAZONES AND BONE FRACTURES

June 12, 2009 (New Orleans, Louisiana) - The largest study to date looking at whether the risk of bone fractures is increased in the setting of thiazolidinedione drugs (TZDs) suggests that fracture risk is more than 40% higher in people taking TZDs and that both men and women are vulnerable [1].

The analysis, presented by Dr Merri Pendergrass (Harvard University, Boston, MA) and colleagues during the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2009 Scientific Sessions, looked at almost 70 000 patients taking either rosiglitazone (Avandia, GlaxoSmithKline) or pioglitazone (Actos, Takeda) and, unlike other studies, found no difference in fracture risk between the two TZDs.

"I think these agents should be avoided in people at high risk for fracture--unless, of course, particular benefits for a particular patient seem high," Pendergrass told heartwire --for example, a patient with high hypoglycemia risk who is not a good candidate for other classes of medications. Of note, Pendergrass continued, diabetes itself increases the risk for fracture. "So a postmenopausal woman with diabetes would have a particularly high risk--especially if she smoked, had a family history of fracture, or other additional fracture risk factors."

Pendergrass and colleagues reviewed the Medco database--more than 13 million people--looking for all patients between the ages of 43 and 63 at study onset with diabetes and a TZD prescription or any diabetic patients within the same age group taking metformin, exenatide (Byetta, Amylin/Lilly), or a sulfonylurea. They then used a linear-regression model to adjust for age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, osteoporosis, stroke, and prior fracture to compare fracture risks in patients with "glitazone" prescriptions and in patients with no TZD prescription over the study period (January 2006 through June 2008).

They found that fracture rates were higher among all patients taking TZDs, with no difference between those taking pioglitazone vs rosiglitazone. Fracture rate was also higher in both women taking TZDs vs controls and in men taking TZDs vs controls (although the fracture rate was higher in women than men). According to Pendergrass, this is the first study to show an increased fracture rate in men as well as women. Of note, however, an analysis that looked only at recent TZD prescriptions did not find an increased fracture risk in men, suggesting that men may need to be on the drugs for longer than 18 months before developing an increased risk of broken bones.

Both older women and older men (age 50 to 65 at study conclusion) had a significantly increased fracture risk, but in younger subjects (age 43 to 49) only women were at significantly increased risk. Of note, the study could not control for alcohol consumption and smoking, both of which are known risk factors for fractures. Older adults (age 65 and older) could not be included in the analysis, due to a lack of data, the authors note.

Odds Ratios for Fracture Risk

Group Odds ratio 95% CI
All patients 1.43 1.35–1.50
All women 1.55 1.44–1.65
All men 1.26 1.16–1.38
New TZD Rx, women* 1.40 1.19–1.64
New TZD Rx, men* 1.09 0.88–1.35
Rosiglitazone vs pioglitazone 1.03 0.96–1.11
*<18 mo

AN INTERESTING STUDY

Related Articles, Links

Carboplatin and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Papaxoinis G, Pectasides E, Xiros N, Sykiotis C, Koumarianou A, Psyrri A, Panayiotides J, Economopoulos T.

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Propaedeutic, Oncology Section, University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece. pectasid@otenet.gr

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel combination in advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. METHODS: Fifty-one eligible patients with measurable advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m every 3 weeks for 6 to 9 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Eight complete (16%) and 19 partial responses (37%) occurred, for an overall response rate (RR) of 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-67%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 5.4-6.5 months), and the median overall survival was 13 months (95% CI, 11.4-14.5 months). The RR was higher in patients with disease outside a previously irradiated site compared with those with disease in a previously irradiated field (68% vs 30%) (P = 0.011). Patients previously treated with chemoradiation had an RR of 28%, whereas in those previously treated with radiotherapy alone, the RR was 68% (P = 0.023). There was no statistically significant difference between histology and response to therapy. Patients with performance status of 0 or 1 had a higher RR than those with worse performance status. Toxicity was generally mild except for myelotoxicity. Neutropenia grade 3/4 was recorded in 44% of patients, and 6% experienced febrile neutropenia. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced anemia grade 3-4, whereas 14% had thrombocytopenia grade 3-4. Three patients (6%) developed grade 3 sensory neuropathy. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel seems to have activity in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma with an acceptable toxicity profile.